Monthly Archives: February 2015

Edition-based vs continuous publishing: what makes sense for me?

Print magazines have a start and an end: they are edition-based. It makes sense doesn’t it, there are physical constraints to printing and distribution, so by bundling and delivering issues publishers benefit from economies of scale. Now however, magazines have gone digital and these physical constraints no longer exist. Publishing, like many other industries is evolving, and the way in which audiences engage with content is changing. So how do you decide which publishing model suits your digital product? Should you choose a continuously updating model or an edition based format?

 

On Thursday Jonny Kaldor, CEO and Co-founder of Kaldor, will be chairing a panel session at the Publishing and Media Expo on just this, here are some of the questions that we think are key to helping you decide what approach to take.

 

What is the nature of your content?

Is your content fast moving or long form? Does it have a long shelf life? Is the idea of finishability key to your readers? A publisher will have to ask themselves these questions before they can define what is the best route for them. The Week for example, publish editions in line with their intention to present a definitive “all you need to know about everything that matters”. Evo on the other hand, use a hybrid model. Through a continuous style of publishing, they release content as soon as it’s ready but then have a ‘finished’ edition once all the content has been published. Readers can then choose to consume as it is published, or wait until the end of the month to read the edition cover to cover.

 

How often do you want customers to engage and for how long?

Do you want users to come back multiple times a week? Would you prefer to your readers’ attention less often but for longer periods of time? To answer these questions you need to think about your audience base. A traditional audience may expect edition based content, whereas newer (more radical) audiences could be more open to the continuously updating concept. Reading content from cover to cover can be argued as being more rewarding than reading from a continuous newsfeed. The Economist value this concept; their aim is to create content which sustains the reader’s interest from cover to cover and gives them that satisfying feeling of being ‘finished’, something which can’t be achieved with a continuous publishing model. However, if you’d rather increase the frequency of users coming to your app, then a continuous publishing model could be perfect for you. Health Service Journal for example, has seen the number of monthly subscriber visits to their app triple since it re-launched in October 2014 using Pugpig for Continuous Publishing.

 

How do you intend to make money and what do your advertisers want?

Do you intend to offer subscriptions or charge for single editions? What advertising opportunities do you want to offer? Do your advertisers want editorially placed full page interstitials, or would an algorithmic model suit them more? These might not be easy questions to answer, but they will help you decide which publishing model is best for you. Subscriptions can be applied on either model, charging for single editions however clearly can’t exist in continuous publishing. Advertising models are another factor to take into consideration. If you’re a magazine like Stylist, editorially placed interstitials are important for the look and feel of a magazine. Retail Week however, uses a continuous publishing model and relies upon MPUs and algorithmic interstitials to support advertisements and give a different user experience.

 

So what’s the answer?

There is no right or wrong answer, it’s simply whatever suits you and your business. By reading through these questions, and thinking about your answers, you should be able to see one model that suits your publication more than the other.

 

Can I find out more?

Of course. Come and find us at the Publishing and Media Expo event over the next two days. Jonny will be chairing this panel session at 3pm on Thursday in the Production Theatre, with The Economist and Incisive Media talking about their publishing models. We’re going to be on stand A40 for the whole event and are happy to have a chat and discuss any questions you may have about digital publishing.

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusfacebooktwittergoogle_plus

We’re going to P&ME, are you?

Jonny’s slides are done, the stand is packed and our iPads are charged – we’re officially ready for the Publishing and Media Expo to start! Come and say ‘hi’ to us on stand A40 if you’re going to be there, and don’t forget to come along to Jonny’s speaking slots. He’s presenting in the Production Theatre at 2pm on Wednesday and 3pm on Thursday. See you there.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusfacebooktwittergoogle_plus

Thanks for having us at Specle Day 2015

specle-day-jon-marks-thumb

Yesterday our great leader Jon Marks took part in Specle Day 2015, an afternoon of presentations and networking hosted by Specle, the leading supplier of advertising systems for Digital Editions in the UK. The afternoon saw over 100 people gather at Graphic Bar in London to discuss all things advertising. Our friends at Condé Nast, News UK, William Hill and Specle all joined Jon in taking to the floor to present. Jon demonstrated how our new cloud based product (Pugpig in the Clouds) can automate the addition of adverts to your digital edition, using the Specle API. This was the first time that shiny new Pugpig in the Clouds has ever been shown outside Kaldor Towers, watch this space for more information coming soon! Thanks to Specle for having us at the event, we really enjoyed it, but we think we might have had a few too many celebratory drinks after the presentations finished.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusfacebooktwittergoogle_plus

Five Pugpig client apps make the BMA shortlist

bma blog logo

Huge congratulations to Porter, Cyclist, Stylist, Auto Express and Health Service Journal who have all made the shortlist for the British Media Awards 2015. The awards highlight the best in business across the media industry and we’ve got our fingers crossed for some Pugpig-powered winners on the night.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusfacebooktwittergoogle_plus

EMAP launches 20 apps using Pugpig for Continuous Publishing in under a year

Emap-bundleV2

Kaldor and EMAP celebrate the launch of 20 fully-interactive, industry-leading B2B content apps across iOS and Android within the past 12 months using Pugpig for Continuous Publishing.

 

Launched earlier this week Architectural Review, Retail Jeweller and Ground Engineering join Retail Week, Nursing Times, Drapers, MEED, Construction News, New Civil Engineer and Health Service Journal (HSJ) as EMAP titles to have adopted a continually updating publishing model. Rather than simply replicate their print titles, EMAP has questioned the role of digital titles and created a ‘breaking news’ environment for users. An article is published to the app as soon as it is written, with as many as 25 articles uploaded daily to the highest traffic apps.

 

EMAP’s large-scale digital roll-out started with the launch of MEED in June 2014 and was closely followed by the launch of HSJ (the 2014 PPA magazine of the year) and Retail Week which now adopts a ‘digital first’ ethos with 70% of its content published online first, if not exclusively. EMAP benefited from cost savings by using Pugpig across all their apps, and re-purposing the same templates and infrastructure throughout the whole project. After the initial setup phase, subsequent apps were rolled out in under 3 days.

 

All EMAP titles are available on iOS and Android and allow subscribers to consume the most current content on-the-go with features like offline reading, favourites and social media sharing.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusfacebooktwittergoogle_plus